The article discusses the arrest of actor Kasthuri by the Greater Chennai Police on November 17, in Hyderabad. She was later granted bail by a court in Chennai on November 21. This incident raises important questions about the balance between freedom of speech and the limits of hate speech.
Kasthuri had made offensive and derogatory remarks about the Telugu community during an event in Chennai earlier in November. Because of these remarks, she applied for anticipatory bail, fearing that the police would take action against her. However, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court rejected her bail request. The court said that her speech could be considered hate speech, and it noted that her apology did not seem genuine. The court emphasized that in today’s world, where social media makes everything public and permanent, speakers should be very careful about what they say, especially when they have a large audience.
The article agrees with the court’s view that speakers should be careful, particularly when discussing sensitive topics like migration, which Kasthuri was talking about. The article suggests that if someone wants to speak about serious issues, they should do proper research and consult experts, such as historians or archaeologists. Public figures have a responsibility to choose their words carefully and ensure they do not incite or hurt any community.
However, the article also argues that arrest should not be the immediate response in cases where someone has made a mistake by speaking inappropriately. The police had enough material to investigate the case, and there was no immediate risk to public safety or law and order. So, the article suggests that the arrest seemed unnecessary. The article also mentions that three months ago, the Supreme Court of India ruled that “bail is the rule and jail is an exception,” meaning that people should usually be allowed bail unless there is a strong reason not to. The Madurai Bench did not seem to consider this principle before rejecting Kasthuri’s anticipatory bail.
Despite the court’s rejection, the prosecution later agreed to her bail. The article points out that while the state should ensure that public speakers act responsibly, it should not rush to curtail an individual’s freedom at the first sign of wrongdoing. The justice system should be patient and thorough, rather than acting hastily, especially when no significant harm has occurred.
In conclusion, the article stresses the importance of balancing freedom of expression with reasonable restrictions. Public speakers, especially celebrities, should be aware of the power their words have on society and avoid causing harm. At the same time, the state should be cautious in limiting people’s freedoms and should ensure that justice is done without rushing to punishment.
.
.
.
…join our telegram channel for regular updates of The Hindu Epaper Editorial Explanation-https://t.me/Thehindueditorialexplanation
The Hindu Epaper Editorial Explanation given by Hello Student is only a supplementary reading to the original article to make things easier for the students.
In conclusion, preparing for exams in India can be a daunting task, but with the right strategies and resources, success is within reach. Remember, consistent study habits, effective time management, and a positive mindset are key to overcoming any academic challenge. Utilize the tips and techniques shared in this post to enhance your preparation and boost your confidence. Stay focused, stay motivated, and don’t forget to take care of your well-being. With dedication and perseverance, you can achieve your academic goals and pave the way for a bright future. Good luck!
The Editorial Page of The Hindu is an essential reading for all the students aspiring for UPSC, SSC, PCS, Judiciary etc or any other competitive government exams.
This may also be useful for exams like CUET UG and CUET PG, GATE, GMAT, GRE AND CAT
To read this article in Hindi –https://bhaarat.hellostudent.co.in/